Make no delay at all in justice, the law that you know, Regulations by the vizier Rekhmire. Ancient Egypt had a more or less developed legal. The laws were at least partially codified. The sources of law are funerary texts, inscriptions and documents. The pharaoh was the living god and the supreme legislator.This authority has been delegated, sometimes to other officials such as viziers. The legal and administrative systems do not seem to have been well defined, and sometimes if someone in a position of authority may be made of judicial decisions.
There were about eight pounds that had the Egyptian legal code. Documentation of previous cases have been recorded and stored, and the court documents were used as a precedent for common cases. Legal proceedings have also been documented.Disputes are common among people on issues such as inheritance, property rights, marital affairs, etc. Murder, attempted murder, robbery, theft, sexual assault and receiving stolen goods were criminal offenses. Plundering of tombs has been considered the worst of crimes.
Crime prevention and apprehension of criminals was the duty of local officials and police forces. It is often expressed the view of some historians that the Egyptian punishment was barbaric in nature. Important cases were decided by the Pharaoh himself.ancient-Egyptian-legal-systemThe sentences used in the place where the torture, the return of property, banishment, mutilation, forced labor, beatings, fines, confiscation of property, exile and death. Punishment interesting was the elimination of the name of guilt from the graves and burn the guilty life.
The integrated concept behind this was that he would lose his hope for eternal life as his body has not undergone customs of death. The concept of Maat was important in the legal framework. Maat, the goddess of the world order represented truth, balance and justice in the universe. This concept allowed that everyone, except slaves, should be considered equal before the law regardless of wealth or social position.Judging was a professional standard. Judges who had to show impartiality commanded respect from commoners. There were no lawyers and parties to a suit had to present their case.
The applicant was required to prosecute, and if the case was considered to be valid, the defendant would be summoned to appear before the court. Even if the witnesses were sometimes called, the judge should normally decide on the grounds of documentary evidence and the testimony of each party.The oral and written evidence were taken into consideration while judgments were written. The confession was the basis for a conviction. Circumstantial evidence, witnesses and torture were the means to achieve this admission. Judgments were sometimes the divine especially in complicated cases.